Every fall, students around the country look for a college
or university that is a fit with their academic interests, activity preferences,
and financial means. While searching, many students check college ranking lists
done by Time Magazine, Forbes, or U.S News to see which schools are rated
highly.
Recently, President Obama introduced an ambitious plan to
evaluate and rank schools based on factors such as tuition, graduation rate,
student debt, and financial demographics. His goal with this system is to make
college more affordable for middle class American families. According to this
system, need-based federal grants would be given to students attending the universities
with the highest ratings. This new
rating system, in addition to the existing rating systems, leaves an
overwhelming amount of information from which student must evaluate. Which
lists should students use as their primary decision-making tool?
The average cost of public colleges and universities is climbing more than double the inflation rate, making it understandable why the Obama Administration wants to help find a solution to making college more accessible. The average student now graduates with more than $26,000 of debt. While at the same time, loan interest rates are not improving. It’s clear that something needs to change, but I’m not sure this plan is the answer.
The average cost of public colleges and universities is climbing more than double the inflation rate, making it understandable why the Obama Administration wants to help find a solution to making college more accessible. The average student now graduates with more than $26,000 of debt. While at the same time, loan interest rates are not improving. It’s clear that something needs to change, but I’m not sure this plan is the answer.
After reading more about President Obama’s plan, I began to
wonder how the program would achieve its goal of making college more
affordable. Would a school be willing to risk disrupting its current business
model to reduce costs and receive a higher rating? This is quite a gamble for the
schools in need of revenue. By reducing tuition costs, they would actually lose
revenue relying on an uncertain and potentially small amount of federal
funding. Additionally, this will force the price of private schools to decrease
dramatically, which may cause the closing of schools with smaller endowments.
Does this plan need modification? Should it be totally scrapped?
No comments:
Post a Comment